While I haven't worked on Nuendo, I've been told by it's users that you can take tracks in and out of record while in playback, more like a traditional tape machine. ![]() In PT, only tracks record enabled punch in/out. One feature I believe Nuendo has that I think PT should have is the ability to punch in and out on multiple tracks on-the-fly. I am not too fond of any digital platform as of now.but Nuendo is getting close to something that suits my needs. Then transfer in to Nuendo to mix and edit. I almost always track to radar or pro pending on the project. I would not trust a 24 track recording session to my nuendo system. ![]() The single largest weak point of Nuendo.is stability. The nice thing about Nuendo, is that it was built from the ground up to be a 5.1 application, rather than being a stereo application that was added on to. The panning, and automation for surround is very logical and tight. Plugins don't overload very easily.and there is about 8-10 db of head room on channels after the red light hits. Many pro tools users mix on large format consoles so they won't experience it, but if you are mixing in the box.the sound of nuendo can't be beat. Nuendo's 2 mix bus, in my experiences, is signifigantly better than Pro Tools. I am also a huge fan of the sound of Nuendo. ![]() It is very easy to comp/edit/etc audio in nuendo. Nuendo's editing screen ir very logical, and efficient. Second off.Nuendo has improved upon some things in the DAW world. I am a Nuendo home user, and a regular pro tools user.įirst off.pro tools is a great platform.no doubt.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |